Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors for the recurrence of abdominal desmoid tumors: a retrospective study of 113 patients from two Chinese hospitals [Full Article]

This study was aimed to delineate the clinicopathological features and determine the prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in abdominal desmoid tumors (ADTs) after macroscopic complete surgical resection.

This meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42018100653) uses individual patient data (IPD) to assess the association between recurrence and CTNNB1 mutation status in surgically treated adult desmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF) patients. A systematic literature search was performed on June 6th, 2018. Seven studies, describing retrospective cohorts were included and the IPD of 329 patients were used of whom 154 (46.8%) had a T41A mutation, 66 (20.1%) a S45F mutation, and 24 (7.3%) a S45P mutation, whereas 85 (25.8%) patients had a WT CTNNB1. Eighty-three patients (25.2%) experienced recurrence. Multivariable analysis, adjusting for sex, age, and tumor site yielded a P-value of 0.011 for CTNNB1 mutation. Additional adjustment for tumor size yielded a P-value of 0.082 with hazard ratio’s of 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-1.42), 0.37 (95% CI 0.12-1.14), and 0.44 (95% CI 0.21-0.92) for T41A, S45P and WT DTF tumors compared to S45F DTF tumors. The effect modification between tumor size and mutation type suggests that tumor size is an important mediator for recurrence. Primary sporadic DTFs harboring a CTNNB1 S45F mutation have a higher risk of recurrence after surgery compared to T41A, S45P, and WT DTF, but this association seems to be mediated by tumor size.

Background: Desmoid type fibromatosis (DTF) is a rare benign neoplasm with infiltrative growth and high local recurrences. Due to long disease course, unpredictable growth pattern, and low mortality, using only survival outcomes may be inappropriate. In this study we assessed the impact of DTF on health related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done in patients with DTF. The study participants were asked to fill the EORTC QLQ-C30, GAD-7 and PHQ-9 questionnaires to assess HRQoL, anxiety and depression. Outcomes were also compared with healthy controls. Results: 204 subjects (102 DTF patients and 102 healthy controls) were recruited. Study parameters have been summarized in Table. Appendicular skeleton (limbs + girdle) was most commonly involved in 59 % patients and abdominal wall or mesentery was involved in 22.5 %. Patients have received median of 2 lines of therapy. 54 % patients were currently on sorafenib and 41 % were under active surveillance. Mean global health status in DTF patient 65.58 ± 22.64, was significantly lower than healthy controls. Similarly, DTF patients scored low on all functional scales except cognitive functioning. Symptom scale showed significantly higher symptom burden of fatigue, pain, insomnia and financial difficulties. Anxiety & depression was observed in 39.22 % and 50 % of DTF patients respectively. DTF patients had higher rates of mild, moderate and severe anxiety and depression compared to healthy controls. No difference was observed based on site of disease. Conclusions: DTF patients have significant symptom burden, poor functioning, and heightened anxiety and depression. Patient reported outcomes should be routinely used to assess treatment efficacy in DTF patients.

Background: Desmoid tumors are a benign sarcoma diagnosed in 4-5 patients per million each year. The Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation (DTRF) launched the patient registry and natural history study (NHS) in 2017. This is a retrospective analysis of diagnostic data collected, tumor location, rates of misdiagnosis, how genetics testing is being incorporated into clinical practice, and additional clinical trial participation. Methods: The NHS launched September 2017 and contains 15 surveys covering diagnostics, disease, treatment, care management, and quality of life. Current reporting as of December 31, 2020, contains 619 participants or legally authorized representatives for which a subset have completed the surveys on desmoid tumor diagnoses. Results: Survey analysis documents that the most prevalent tumor locations were intra-abdominal 35.5% (220), joint / extremities 21.2% (131), and chest wall 14.7% (91). The majority of participants, 68.2%, reported that they had unifocal tumors (199/292), 19.5% reported that they had multifocal desmoid tumors (57). Biopsy procedures were the primary method of diagnosis according to 57.2% (167/292) of the participants, with needle biopsy comprising 19.8% (33/167). Biopsy as the primary method of diagnosis was most prevalent in tumors of the head and neck (18/26, 69.2%), chest wall (32/47, 68.1%) joint /extremities (50/90, 55.6%), and abdominal tumors (27/51, 52.9%). Additionally, imaging methods (CT, MRI) were the primary method of diagnosis in 22.6% (66/292) and surgical resection 14.4% (42/292). Misdiagnosis is common for this tumor type, as 41.0% (119/290) participants reported an incorrect initial diagnosis. The reported incorrect diagnoses are described in the table. Genetic testing is not standard of care for desmoid tumors but is increasing in practice. A total of 78 participants (28%) of 282 participants report they had genetic testing (germline or somatic) of their tumor tissue. The majority of those participants, 65.4% (51/78), reported having Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (F.A.P.). Of the participants that had genetic testing, 89.0% live in the United States. 10.5% of participants (37/353) have reported having participated in clinical trials. The majority of participants (317/368, 86.1%) are willing to participate in other studies in the future, with 77.4% (285/368) willing to donate specimens for biomarker studies. Conclusions: Participants with desmoid tumors report many methods of diagnosis for their diverse tumor locations, high rates of misdiagnosis, and increased rates of genetic mutation testing. Data collection through the DTRF NHS is ongoing.

Background: The Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation (DTRF) launched the natural history study (NHS) in 2017. At this time, there are no standard-of-care options for this rare sarcoma. The treatments, clinical descriptors, and the patient reported outcomes to pharmacologic agents are described here within. Methods: The web-based natural history study launched September 2017 in collaboration with the National Organization of Rare Disorders. It contains 15 surveys covering diagnostics, disease, treatment, care management, and quality of life. Treatment types included in the DTRF NHS were pharmacology, surgery, radiation, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HiFU), and active surveillance (watch and wait). Results: While surgery was once the primary intervention for desmoid tumor patients, the NHS participants reported that 47.6% had received active surveillance or no systemic treatment at diagnosis. This is most common for desmoid tumors located in abdominal wall (54/103; 52.4%). There were 87 reported cases of complete surgical resection, 38 incomplete resections, and 23 bowel resections. 9 amputations were reported; 8 participants reported recurrent disease following the removal of the limb. The non-surgical interventions, such as radiation and HiFU, were mostly described for participants with chest wall tumors (15 pts) and joints/extremities (10 pts). Many options for systemic therapies were described including sorafenib (44/284; 15.5%), sulindac (36/284; 12.7%), and anti-hormonal agents tamoxifen and toremifene (34/285; 10.9%) were described. Targeted agents, such as gamma secretase inhibitor, pazopanib, and sorafenib, were greater in the United States than the non-US country participants (21% vs 9%). Multiple lines of treatments were reported by 81 participants, surgery is greatest as the first intervention for all tumor locations (49/81, 60%), with the exception of those with head/neck tumors who received chemotherapy (6/11, 55%). Analysis has started to evaluate the efficacy of systemic treatments from these NHS data. The table describes the participant reported outcomes of anti-hormonal agents, chemotherapeutics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, and targeted agents. Both chemotherapies and targeted agents were reported to have 38.1% response rates from the participants with 34.3% and 23.8% of participants reported progressive disease on therapy, respectively. Conclusions: Desmoid tumor NHS study participants reported the use of many treatment modalities demonstrating a range of frequency of use by tumor location and efficacy. Data collection through the DTRF NHS is ongoing.

Background: Desmoid tumor (DT) is a rare disease characterized by histologically monoclonal fibroblastic proliferation. DT does not have metastatic spread potentially but can be infiltrative and locally aggressive and decrease patients’ quality of life. Although current treatment guidelines recommend active surveillance as initial therapy, systemic therapy should be considered in rapidly progressing or symptomatic patients. Systemic treatments for DT include hormonal blockade, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. In this real-life study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib in patients with progressing or symptomatic DT. Methods: The clinical, pathological, and treatment data of the patients were retrospectively evaluated. Also, prognostic parameters for overall survival were assessed. We used SPSS v.25 for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analysis were used for survival analysis. Results: Seventeen patients were included in the study. The ratio of female/male patients was 2.4, and the median age was 32 (range,14-65). Four (23.5%) patients had Gardner syndrome. The rates of extra-abdominal and ?ntra-abdominal tumor locations were 64.7% and 35.3%, respectively. The median follow-up duration before sorafenib was 6±0.84 years. Before sorafenib, 15 patients had underwent surgical resection. Four (23.5%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. All patients received median two-line systemic therapy, and four (23.5%) patients had received chemotherapy. The median treatment duration of sorafenib was 23.4±2.2 months. One- and two-year progression-free survival ratios were 94.1% and 80.7%, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were observed in six (35.2%) of the patients. In univariate analysis, we found that gender (p = 0.012), ECOG performance status (p = 0.032), and history of Gardner syndrome (p = 0.021) were statistically significant prognostic factors for progression-free survival. However, there was no statistically significant between extra-abdominal and ?ntra-abdominal tumor locations (p = 0.56). Conclusions: In the study, we observed that sorafenib was an effective treatment option for previously treated advanced desmoid tumors. Despite a small number of patients, we detected that male gender, poor ECOG performance status, and history of Gardner syndrome were negative prognostic factors for progression-free survival.